患者報告アウトカム
(Patient-Reported Outcome:PRO
評価関連 特設ページ

厚生労働省科学研究班開発
患者報告アウトカム(Patient-Reported Outcome:PRO)
使用についてのガイダンス集

臨床試験のためのPatient-Reported Outcome(PRO)使用ガイダンス

3. 参考文献・参考書籍

諸外国のPRO関連ガイダンスの系統的レビューより得られた主要な参考文献・書籍を以下に示す。

項目 著者名 タイトル 書誌事項
1.1-
1.2
Basch E. The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(10): 865-9.[PubMed
下妻 晃二郎 QOL評価研究の歴史と展望 行動医学研究. 2015; 21(1): 4-7.
2.1 Acquadro C. Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003; 6(5): 522-31.[PubMed
2.2 European Medicines Agency. Appendix 2 to the guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. 2016. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/appendix-2-guideline-evaluation-anticancer-medicinal-products-man-use-patient-reported-outcome-pro-measures-oncology-studies-scientific-guideline
ICH Assembly. ICH Reflection paper Proposed ICH Guideline Work to Advance Patient Focused Drug Development. https://admin.ich.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/ICH_ReflectionPaper_PFDD_FinalRevisedPostConsultation_2021_0602.pdf
Mayo NE. Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series e Paper 2: terminology proposed to measure what matters in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 89: 119-24.[PubMed
US. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance Series for Enhancing the Incorporation of the Patient's Voice in Medical Product Development and Regulatory Decision Making. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/fda-patient-focused-drug-development-guidance-series-enhancing-incorporation-patients-voice-medical
US. Food and Drug Administration. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. 2009. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims
国際医薬経済・アウトカム研究学会日本部会 ワーキンググループ 監訳. 患者報告アウトカム(Patient-Reported Outcome: PRO)の測定法:医薬品/医療機器における適応申請のための方法. https://ispor-jp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/patient-reported-outcome-pro.pdf
2.3 Walton MK. Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation-Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment - Emerging Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force. Value Health. 2015; 18(6): 741-52.[PubMed
Mokkink LB. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5): 1171-9.[PubMed
Prinsen CA. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5): 1147-57.[PubMed
Reeve BB. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22(8): 1889-905.[PubMed
Terwee CB. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5): 1159-70.[PubMed
2.4 Fayers P & Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes 3rd edition. Wiley, 2016
ピーター・M・フェイヤーズ 著(福原俊一 監訳). QOL評価学 測定、解析、解釈のすべて. 中山書店.2005
2.5 O'Brien BC. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014; 89(9): 1245-51.[PubMed
Pope C & Mays N (eds.) Qualitative research in health care 3rd edition. BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing, 2006
Rothrock NE. Developing a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 90(5): 737-42.[PubMed
Tong A. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6): 349-57.[PubMed
2.6 Anfray C. Reflection paper on copyright, patient reported outcome instruments and their translations. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018; 16(1): 224.[PubMed
Wild D. ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005; 8(2): 94-104.[PubMed
2.7 Byrom B, Muehlhausen W. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: An Implementation Handbook For Clinical Research. Amazon, 2018
Coons SJ. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2009; 12(4): 419-29.[PubMed
Ly JJ. Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019; 53(4): 431-40.[PubMed
Matza LS. Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force. Value Health. 2013; 16(4): 461-79.[PubMed
Morel T. Measuring what matters to rare disease patients - reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017; 12(1): 171.[PubMed
Wailoo AJ. Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value Health. 2017; 20(1): 18-27.[PubMed
白岩健,船越大,村澤秀樹,下妻晃二郎,斎藤信,福田敬. 医療経済評価におけるマッピングとMAPS 声明について. 保健医療科学 2018; 67(4): 422-6.
下妻晃二郎. 医療の効率性と公平性(総論) 日内会誌. 2014; 103(5): 1203-9.
2.8 Brundage M. Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. Qual Life Res, 2013; 22(6): 1161-75.[PubMed
Calvert M. Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials: The CONSORT-PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;27;309(8):814-22.[PubMed
Calvert M. Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension. JAMA. 2018; 319(5): 483-94.[PubMed
2.9 Bottomley A. Analysing data from patient-reported outcome and quality of life endpoints for cancer clinical trials: a start in setting international standards. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(11): e510-e514.[PubMed
Coens C. International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(2): e83-e96.[PubMed
Fiero MH. Demystifying the estimand framework: a case study using patient-reported outcomes in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(10): e488-e494.[PubMed
2.10 King MT. A point of minimal important difference (MID): A critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011; 11(2): 171-84.[PubMed
Revicki D. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(2): 102-9. [PubMed
Cocks K. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48(11): 1713-21.[PubMed
Wyrwich KW. Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013; 22(3): 475-83.[PubMed
2.11 Wilson H. Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(1): 5-16.[PubMed
Facey K, Hansen HP, and Single A (eds.) Patient involvement in health technology assessment (Developing Patient-Reported and Relevant Outcome Measures). Adis, Spting Nature.2017
2.12 Rivera SC. Ethical Considerations for the Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research: The PRO Ethics Guidelines. JAMA. 2022; 327(19): 1910-9.[PubMed
その他 Banerjee AK. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013; 36(12): 1129-49.[PubMed
Sajobi TT. Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(5): 1133-46.[PubMed